cta-image

Donate

Donations from readers like you allow us to do what we do. Please help us continue our work with a monthly or one-time donation.

Donate Today
cta-image

Subscribe Today

Subscribe to receive daily or weekly MEMRI emails on the topics that most interest you.
Subscribe
cta-image

Request a Clip

Media, government, and academia can request a MEMRI clip or other MEMRI research, or ask to consult with or interview a MEMRI expert.
Request Clip
Aug 30, 2019
Share Video:

Iraqi Academic Dr. Akeel Abbas: Iranian Influence Is Preventing a Unified, Democratic Iraq; Israel Hasn't Posed a Threat to Us in Almost 20 Years

#7467 | 03:30
Source: NRT TV (Iraqi Kurdistan)

Iraqi academic Dr. Akeel Abbas said in an August 30, 2019 interview on NRT TV (Iraqi Kurdistan) that conspiracy theories tend to thrive in societies that are replete with indoctrination and sacred narratives about absolute truth, and he said that since Iraqi society does not have a long traditional of serious analytical critique, it does not properly understand the roles that Israel and Iran play in the region. Dr. Abbas said that Iran has strategic advantages for cultural and geographic reasons and because it has proxies that are willing to fight on its behalf. In contrast, he said that Israel is far more successful than Iran and other Middle Eastern countries in developmental and economic parameters, despite psychological, moral, religious, and political barriers between it and Arabs and Muslims. He said that Israel's success is also why Arabs have a tendency to attribute Israel's preeminence to conspiracies and Western support. In addition, Dr. Abbas said that Iranian influence in Iraq has prevented the emergence of a unified and democratic Iraq, partly because Iran insists on dividing Iraq along sectarian and racial lines. In contrast, he added that Israel has not posed a threat to Iraq in almost 20 years.

Following are excerpts:

 

Dr. Akeel Abbas: I believe that conspiracy [theories] thrive in societies that are replete with indoctrination, sacred narrative about absolute truths, and a very absolute understanding of life. Our society does not have a long tradition of serious analytical critique, and this reflects on our way of understanding the Iranian role or the Israeli role in the region, for example. In the region today, two major forces are in a state of conflict – or in a state of declared war. These are Israel and Iran. Iran enjoys many strategic advantages for reasons that are connected to culture and geography. It has many proxies that are willing to wage proxy wars and that are very talented in this. Iran has extensions in the region. Israel does not have the same capabilities because there is a psychological, moral, religious, and political barrier in the region between Arabs and Muslims and Israel. It's a long and complicated story. However, Israel is a successful country in all parameters of development, and this is opposite from the case in Iran. It is true that Israel is incapable of spreading in the region, but it has many internal sources of power. Israel's gross national income surpasses Iran's by approximately $196 billion per annum. Israel does not have oil and it relies on industry. It is a small country with a population of only 6 million, but they produce more than 6 or 7 Arab countries. Israel's success comes from within. But we have a tendency to give Israel's preeminence a moralistic and conspiratorial interpretation. In other words, we attribute it to a Western conspiracy, to Western support, and to these kinds of things.

 

[…]

 

Iraq does not need external wars in order to build itself. We need to concentrate on building ourselves from within after decades of external wars and proxy wars. There is definitely Iranian influence in Iraq. This influence is problematic and weakens the chances that a unified Iraqi state will emerge. I believe that for the past 15 or 16 years, Israel has not been a real threat to Iraqi democracy. Iran's behavior is the real threat to Iraqi democracy. Iran insists upon dividing Iraq along sectarian and racial lines. They call it "consensus democracy," but this "consensus democracy" that is based on race and religion, which Iran has been supporting since 2003, has thwarted the emergence of true democracy [in Iraq].