The following excerpts
are from an interview with Iraqi Shiite Leader Muqtada Al-Sadr, which
aired on Al-Jazeera TV on April 1, 2010.
Muqtada Al-Sadr:
With regard to the referendum, I have only one reservation. If a Sadrist
from the Al-Ahrar bloc is elected, I will oppose him, because I don’t
want people from this bloc to shake hands with the occupation. It would
be difficult for me to accept a PM from the Al-Ahrar bloc, yet we are
deliberating this now. But on the other hand, the referendum…
Interviewer: You
don’t want a Sadrist PM so he won’t have to shake hands with whom?
Muqtada Al-Sadr:
I’m not saying I don’t want this, only that it is being deliberated.
If we must – so be it. If there is nobody who can manage Iraqi affairs,
we may turn to someone from the Sadrist movement or the Al-Ahrar bloc.
Interviewer: This
is proof that you have begun to play the game of politics. You are saying
this so that the others will know that the Sadrist movement and Muqtada
Al-Sadr may present a candidate.
Muqtada Al-Sadr:
That’s possible. Why not? We are part of the people, part of the political
process, and part of the military resistance, and so on. This path is
open to us. But even if the referendum does not support the Al-Ahrar
bloc and the Sadrists, I will still be bound by it.
[...]
Interviewer:
There is a security agreement that is supposed to be implemented in
2011. What is your view on this? Isn’t this an achievement of Al-Maliki
and his government, in your opinion? They signed an agreement guaranteeing
the withdrawal of the US troops. When this agreement is implemented
and the US troops withdraw, will you consider Iraq to have been liberated
or not?
Muqtada Al-Sadr:
I was, and I continue to be, one of the opponents of this agreement.
Interviewer: You
don’t consider it an achievement of Al-Maliki?
Muqtada Al-Sadr:
No, I consider it a failure. We will not consider Iraq to be liberated
by this agreement. We will only consider it to be liberated when every
single [foreign] soldier has left our sacred Iraqi soil. The military
bases too – not only the soldiers… The soldiers, the companies,
the intelligence agencies, and the bases – only when they all have
left can we consider Iraq to be liberated. Until this happens, Iraq
lacks sovereignty and lacks independence.